Facebook is working overtime to censor this image, please spread the word. #tcot #ctot #ccot #SJWLogic #SJWagenda via @Linkis_com

Facebook is working overtime to censor this image, please spread the word. #tcot #ctot #ccot #SJWLogic #SJWagenda via @Linkis_com

"TOLERANCE": A Must-See YouTube Commentary About the "Mindset" Of SJWs

I have one word to say about this video: YES!!!!

Polish MEP calls refugees human trash [ENGLISH SUBTITLES][SEE MAYMAYS]

And people thought what Donald Trump said about "immigrants" was bad! (Did you happen to catch the, uh-hum, reactions to his speech AFTER it was over? That pretty much says it all, doesn't it?)

How The Media Lost Its "Liberal" Mind Over Ahmed "Clock Boy" Mohamed

This is Ahmed Mohamed's, uh-hum, clock. I'm STILL
trying to figure out HOW you tell time on THIS thing!

This is Ahmed Mohamed in handcuffs.

This is the ONLY "case clock" I could find.

Hey, you wanna know who ELSE puts clocks in cases?
That's right! ACTUAL BOMBERS!!!!

This is Ahmed with his "Muslim activist" father during a
press conference.

Yeah, and I'm sure if someone brought THIS contraption
to the WH Secret Service would just let them on in!

Sorry, Pop-Tart Kid, that's ONLY if you're a Muslim, am I
right, lefties?

By now I'm sure everyone has heard about the “incident” involving Muslim teen Ahmed Mohamed otherwise known as Clock Boy. For those few who haven't heard of this particular story, here's the basics (which, of course, seems to keep changing from story to story): Ahmed brings a “clock” he claims he “invented” to his Texas school and, according to which story you go by, either the first teacher he showed it to or the second teacher sees the clock and immediately calls authorities who then cuff Clock Boy and lead him out where they question him about his “clock” to see whether or not it was in fact some sort of explosive device. Well, this story makes nationwide news and the left—of course!—immediately seize upon this story and says this boy was ONLY “arrested” because he was—wait for it!—Muslim. Since this kid's “arrest” he's become a leftie “hero” as he's been showered with gifts and offers, including free scholarships and even an “invite” from President Barack Obama himself to the White House.

Added to the “controversy” is Ahmed's father who's a known Muslim activist named Mohamed ElHassan Mohamed. In 2011, Mohamed “defended” the Koran during a mock trial brought by that Terry Jones guy who ended up burning the Koran. Mohamed also ran for president of his native Sudan twice. Some, of course, have questioned whether or not Ahmed's father was the one who “orchestrated” this whole “controversy” just so he can get a bigger foothold in Islamic politics. (He at one point reportedly claimed the Texas cops had actually “tortured” his son.) Some have even claimed he was the one who “invented” the clock knowing full well how the school would “react” when they saw it. All I've got to say about this is that, if Mr. Mohamed DIDN'T “orchestrate” this whole insipid “controversy” involving his son he's damn sure “benefited” from it, hasn't he?

Going back to Clock Boy, I myself don't fault the school or the authorities for “reacting” the way they did to this boy's “clock” (again, depending on which account you read about his supposed “treatment” and/or “mistreatment” by said school and/or authorities). I mean, the unfortunate truth of the matter is that we live in a society where mass shootings/mass killings do occur at schools and elsewhere. This all even took place not far from where those two MUSLIMS attempted to shoot up and/or blow up that by-now-infamous “Draw Mohammed” cartoon contest put on by that “controversial” right-wing group before they were shot down by a cop (thank God!). Now maybe—just maybe!—the cops went a bit too far handcuffing the kid, but, at the same time, the left went WAY too far glorifying THIS kid and making Clock Boy the Poster Boy for anti-Islamaphobia or whatever.

But let's take a gander at Ahmed's supposed clock, shall we? First off, this kid IS a fraud or, at the VERY least, delusional. I mean, his and others claim that he "invented" ANYTHING is just simply absurd. Other people who have looked at his "clock" objectively have stated that all he—or his father—did was take apart another clock and rather haphazardly stick its parts inside the case. Not only that, but these people have also pointed out that the manner in which the "clock" was made with the wires sticking out and everything could possibly SHOCK people if they tried to use it. Is THIS what passes for "invention" these days? What "outrages" me about all this is that there ARE kids, including other Muslim kids, who DO invent "cool" things who will NEVER be offered free scholarships and they damn sure WON'T be "invited" to the White House. Just why in the hell would ANYONE "use" his "clock" when they can go down to their local Wal-Mart and buy one for around five to ten bucks? In spite of the what the left has claimed, Thomas Edison this boy is most definitely NOT!

Let's face facts, if Ahmed Mohamed was anything BUT a Muslim the left and/or the “liberal” media in general would NOT have given two shits about this kid, unjust “arrest” or no. Again, let's face facts, this kid was not only used by his father (allegedly!) he was also used by the left to further their anti-Muslim “racist” narrative (even though Muslims are not—I repeat—NOT an actual race of people since white people can be Muslim too). Don't believe me? Then consider the case a couple years before Clock Boy involving a 7-year-old boy in Nevada who was actually “suspended” from school for supposedly chewing a pop-tart—let me repeat—A POP-TART into the shape of a gun and the case of the 12-year-old boy in Florida who was arrested for—and, no, I'm NOT making this up!—farting in class. FARTING!!!! None of these incidents nor any of the other countless incidents at schools across the country where students have been inexplicably suspended and/or ARRESTED (such as the case of the girl who was arrested at school for “stealing” HER OWN CHEERLEADING UNIFORM!) received anywhere near the media coverage and/or the “outrage” from the left that the insipid Clock Boy incident received. Of course, none of these kids were—you guessed it!—MUSLIM. The not-so-subtle message if you're a kid and you want the “liberal” media and/or even the President to care—or at least pretend to care—about your “unjust” harassment and/or arrest from school and/or your local authorities the way they did Clock Boy—and, of course, NOT how they did with Pop-Tart Kid and/or Fart Boy—then you'd better make damn sure you're a—that's right!—MUSLIM.

Oh, by the way, Mark Cuban—who's hardly what you'd call a staunchly right-wing type of guy—said while he was discussing his phone call with Ahmed Mohamed on Bill Maher's HBO show—leftie Bill Maher, by the way, actually came out in defense of Ahmed's “arrest” for some of the same reasons I gave here—actually admitted that he could actually hear Ahmed's sister COACHING him on what to say during their conversation. Just thought you'd like to know!

A sidenote: Around the same time the lefties were going ballistic over Ahmed "Clock Boy" Mohamed, the New York Times, which is hardly a right-wing publication, reported the horrific story of how our very own troops were "ordered" by the military to ignore Afghan soldiers RAPING young boys ala Catholic priests because it was, according to the military's supposed reasoning, their "culture". Quite frankly, these MUSLIM children are the ones who are TRULY mistreated by those in authority and are damn sure the ones President Obama SHOULD be "inviting" to the White House. But, of course, since there's NO narrative for the left to use and/or exploit, this story has garnered nowhere near the attention nor especially the "outrage" as the Clock Boy story. Anyway, here's the link to the story for anyone who is interested (or anyone who can stomach reading it it's THAT horrific): http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/world/asia/us-soldiers-told-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys.html?_r=0

Here's one of the countless interviews of Ahmed "Clock Boy" Mohamed where he actually says he tried to make his, uh-hum, clock invention look "less suspicious" (now why in the world would he say THAT?):

Here's a video from someone who examined Ahmed's "clock" (from YouTube):

Here's part of Bill Maher's commentary on the whole insipid Ahmed Mohamed "controversy":

#GamerGate: Arthur Chu Angry with Interviewer, Defends Tactics (Of A Few Thoughts On Why I Think Arthur Chu SUCKS!)

Arthur Chu BLOCKED me on Twitter even though I had no direct interaction at all with him on the site. I did tweet about him, often negatively, as I did with a number of other public figures such as Jon Stewart and Donald Trump. (I'm an equal opportunity offender!) But I did not dare tweet anything to him directly because I didn't want to take the chance of him and/or his nutty "followers" to troll me as he's done others, including this interviewer, on Twitter. Which is why I always find it amusing when I hear him moan and whine and complain about all the "harassment" he and his SJW ilk has "suffered" online as a result of their so-called GamerGate criticisms or whatever. The brutal truth of the matter is, Arthur Chu is one of the BIGGEST bullies and/or harassers on Twitter and elsewhere. Just look at what he did to that establishment that dared held a GamerGate meeting whom he harassed and then got his "followers" to harass them in an effort to get them to cancel said GG meeting. Of course, after he infamously tweeted "It ends tonight!", a bomb threat was called into the place and everyone had to be evacuated. I mean, this guy actually trolled a RAPE victim on Twitter all because the woman who started a fundraising campaign online to help her and her family out was a pro-GamerGate person and he bizarrely accused her of somehow "weaponizing" this woman's horrible ordeal to attack HIM and other anti-GamerGate people. And he has the audacity to whine about others "harassing" HIM?

WHY I CAN'T EFFING STAND SJWS (& Why I'm a Proud Anti-SJW!)

Oh, how I wished I heeded George Carlin's "advice" in
my OWN "dealings" with SJWs!

SJW poster boy and former Jeopardy Villian Arthur Chu:
 "feminist ally" AND mocker of RAPE victims!

For once, I agree with Bill O'Reilly (even though, according
to the SJWs, I am or supposed to be a staunch right-winger!)!

Ask "feminist ally" Arthur Chu since SHE was
the RAPE victim he openly MOCKED!

"I do not have to tolerate your wrongness!" was how one SJW
kindly responded after I dared post THIS meme.

From my OWN horrid experience in "dealing" with SJWS:
BOTH!!!!

An SJW on Twitter actually accused me of somehow making
"threats" against the #BlackBrunch group without ANY proof.

#BlackLivesMatter scream the SJWs except in the case of
Jamiel Shaw, Jr. since they COULDN'T politicize HIS death.

I don't like SJWs. No, I take that back. I fucking HATE so-called SJWs. I'll get to the specifics WHY in a moment in this article, but first, an SJW, for those of you who've had the distinct pleasure—or displeasure, I should say—of NEVER having to actually deal with one, is someone who sits on their ass all the time tweeting about so-called “social justice” issues. SJWs by & large really don't do anything about these “issues”; they just tweet about them all day and/or start meaningless “political” hashtags and/or post things to Facebook. One thing the SJWs really love to do is “challenge” those who dare post a viewpoint that dares opposes theirs. That's when they attack, bully and even at times threaten those they “disagree” with. I myself have had the distinct misfortune of having to “deal” with some of these SJWs myself. Of course, when one posts on Twitter and Facebook and other social media chances are you WILL have to “deal” with a “troll” of SOME type. And, believe you me, I've had more than MY fair share of “dealing” with these trolls (like, for instance, when one psycho posted how they wanted to see me dead after they erroneously accused me of posting about them when in fact I had done no such thing). SJWs, however, are a different breed of online “troll” altogether. Hell, SJWs will vehemently, even violently, turn on one of their own. Just ask Suey Park who herself was a SJW “activist” who herself was vehemently—yes, even violently—attacked by her fellow SJWs after she dared begin the Twitter hashtag #CancelColbert in response to “comedian”—and SJW “hero”—Stephen Colbert who hosted the now-defunct The Colbert Report mocking Asians on his now-defunct show. (For the record, Miss Park WASN'T actually trying to “Cancel Colbert” but rather she was using hyperbole to make a point about leftists like Colbert getting away with mocking Asians and other minorities just because she are leftists, which was something she'd done before without much issue. Of course, that was for “issues” the SJWs actually “agreed” with her on.) That's when she received a whole slew of threatening tweets, including death threats and even anti-Asian tweets like the following:

Granted, I haven't gotten “attacked” by SJWs like THIS but it's gotten almost as bad. For instance, I recently had the misfortune of dealing with two—count 'em!—TWO self-proclaimed SJWs after I dared post something THEY didn't like. I actually can't remember what particular post started all of their bullshit. At first I tried to “humor” them by responding to their remarks with smartass memes like the following:

Needless to say, that REALLY pissed them off. They started accusing me of being “offensive” and of being “immature” and how I couldn't make a coherent argument and that's why I had to rely on “offensive” memes. One of the SJWs actually insisted they HADN'T called my memes "offensive" and that I was the one who was calling them "offensive". It was this very same SJW who asked me if I knew how words worked and I'm like, "Do YOU?" Again, #SJWLogic at its BEST, folks! Anyway, here's another one of the memes they claimed was/wasn't "offensive" to their SJW sensibilities:

Again, needless to say, that just made them even MORE pissed off. So pissed off, in fact, that they BOTH started sending me tweet after tweet after tweet after tweet after . . . well, you get the picture. Now, at this point, their harassment got to the point that I admittedly let my emotions get the better of me and I rather angrily started replying to their tweets, which, in hindsight, was a VERY big mistake since that was obviously what THEY wanted me to do. It was then they accused ME of being a—that's right!—troll. As I asked one of them: Just how in the hell can I “troll” my OWN Twitter page?! I mean, as I pointed out to them, I was responding to THEIR own attacks. But, as the Twitter hashtag goes, #SJWLogic and all!

Now, as I implied earlier, this wasn't the FIRST time being “attacked” by an SJW on Twitter. A couple months earlier this SJW psycho practically accused me of “threatening” the so-called Black Brunch group—you remember, the group that would storm into these “upscale”--i.e. WHITE--diners and/or eateries and literally harass people about black people being shot by cops (which, in typical SJW fashion, they backed off when the diners started literally pushing back against them)—after I dared point out the hypocrisy of BB likening themselves to the civil rights activists of the sixties (plus I pointed out their blatant cowardice in NOT going to police stations and harassing COPS instead of “wimpy” WHITE diners). This particular SJW went after me after I remarked how the civil rights activists were, among other things, attacked by police dogs when they protested and posted an old black-and-white pic of a police dog attacking said protester. This SJW first called ME a “dog” and then accused ME of somehow “threatening” the BB group. When I kept asking this SJW psycho HOW it was I was “threatening” this “bunch” they would just keep coming back to me with I made a “threat” against them as one tweet they sent me stated: “A threat is a threat.” So, like the OTHER two SJWs, I ended up BLOCKING their psycho SJW asses.

Going back to the other SJWs who harassed me, a couple of things that I thought were REALLY telling about their “attacks” is that I pointed out to one of them how I had NEVER went on their Twitter page and pulled THIS type of shit on them to which they tweeted “nope”. The other SJW, who was probably the most abrasive one out of the two, stated on their Twitter page was that they kept coming after me because they were clearly “upsetting” me. (For the record, I wasn't “upset” by what they were saying to me because, as I pointed out to them, I'd been called MUCH worse than ANYTHING they could EVER say to me. But I do get "upset" every time I get MY time wasted by some A-Hole/D-Bag, SJW or otherwise.) So, by their OWN admission, they were deliberately trying to get under my skin, NOT trying to change my worldview or anything. Which is, of course, typical for the “average” SJW. You see, SJWs are generally SJWs NOT because they actually want to make a “change” in the world—since THAT, of course, would take a hell of a lot MORE effort than sitting on your SJW ass and tweeting about "injustice" on Twitter—but rather they want to make themselves feel MORE important they what they actually are. Which, of course, could explain the rather abysmal track record of the SJWs of actually changing and/or influencing ANYTHING. Don't believe me? Well, let's have a gander at said SJW track record on actually changing things, shall we?

Black Lives Matter: In spite of the SJWs insistence to the contrary, the ONLY time Black Lives Matter with THIS bunch is when that “black life” is shot & killed by a WHITE cop. Again, don't believe me? Then kindly explain to ME this group's overwhelming silence on the brutal murder of Jamiel Shaw Jr. who is—or was—a 17-year-old high school athlete who, like Kate Steinle (yet another "injustice" the SJWs were overwhelmingly "silent" over), was brutally gunned down by an “illegal” immigrant THUG while he was only a few blocks away from his own house all because he was wearing the “wrong” colors (he was wearing a red Spider-Man backpack). Couple THAT with the group's just-as-overwhelming silence on black-on-black crimes, which, according to statistics, far outnumber the shooting deaths committed by police officers of BOTH races (and which, of course, SJW leader Al Sharpton has all but dismissed). Not only that, but the Black Lives Matter group is reportedly funded, at least partially so, by none other George Soros, who, for those of you who don't know who he is, is a rich old leftie WHITE dude. (And, yes, there's even a hashtag for THIS #CutTheCheck!)

Bring Back Our Girls: If you'll recall, back in May of 2014 several members of the Nigerian “terrorist” group Boko Harem kidnapped approximately 270 schoolgirls to reportedly sell into slavery (or worse). Soon thereafter, dozens upon dozens of SJWs along with other leftie Hollywood celebrities, including First Lady Michelle Obama, posted “selfies” while holding signs that read: Bring Back Our Girls which, of course, included the all-important hashtag #BringBackOurGirls. And just how many girls were “brought back” as a result of all this so-called hashtag activism? Well, is ZERO a number? (One of the funniest things about the BBOG campaign—other than, of course, the sheer narcissism of it—is when noted leftie actor Sean Penn tweeted his own “selfie” with a sign that read: Real Men Don't Buy Girls. Which prompted yours truly to tweet how “real men” also DON'T tie up & torture their ex-wives for hours on end like he did when then-wife Madonna, which, of course, he received a virtual slap-on-the-wrist for since he WAS, no doubt, part of the Hollywood Leftie Elite).

War On Women: The SJWs, in typical SJW fashion, all got BUTTHURT over that by-now-infamous “catcall” video where that guy strapped a hidden camera onto himself and “hired” an actress to walk through a BLACK neighborhood—since you know how BLACK guys are with WHITE women!—so he could record all the utterly horrifying catcalls (such as the despicable “Hey, looks like I found me a million dollars!” and “Damn! DAMN!”) At around the same time, a woman—a BLACK woman—was caught on surveillance cameras being violently dragged off the street by a BLACK guy and the SJWs said—wait for it—NOTHING. So, according to #SJWLogic, a BLACK man catcalling a WHITE woman is far more “offensive” to their SJW sensibilities than a BLACK woman being dragged off the street by a BLACK man (who had reportedly done THIS before with an UNDERAGE girl). Thankfully, the BLACK woman was rescued and was OK (no thanks to the damned SJWs!). Oh yeah, about the “catcall” video, the actress who was “hired” is, at the time of this writing, suing the guy who put out the video—you know, the SAME guy who said he made the video because he was so “concerned” about women's issues and whatnot—for a buttload of moo-lah because she claimed—wait for it!—that he DIDN'T properly pay her. Oh yeah, SJW poster boy Arthur Chu—who “earned” the nickname Jeopardy Villain since he was arguably the MOST disliked Jeopardy contestant in the show's long history (even host Alex Trebek reportedly DIDN'T like his fat SJW ass)—has called himself a “feminist ally” even though he actually belittled an “adult” film star named Cytherea who was brutally gang-raped in her very own home while her husband & child were held at gunpoint by a gang of teenaged THUGS who broke into her home. Apparently, Mr. Chu took “issue” with the WOMAN who began a fund-raising campaign for Miss Cytherea because she was apparently SO traumatized by her horrific ordeal that she refused to leave her very own home and wasn't doing anymore “adult” films, calling said campaign a, and I quote, “stupid charity” and accusing her supporters of “drooling over porn stars” and whatnot all because this WOMAN had—you guessed it!—dared “disagree” with Mr. Chu about . . . aw, who the fuck cares! Arthur “SJW Villain” Chu did eventually relent and donate some of his "hard-earned" Jeopardy winnings to Cytherea's “stupid charity” only AFTER he was “shamed” into it. Man, talk about a #WarOnWomen!

Ban Bossy: This was an insipid campaign—there again, complete with hashtag #BanBossy—started SJWs to “ban” girls and women in general from being called—that's right!—bossy (since, you know, it's “sexist” and all even though MEN GET CALLED BOSSY—AND WORSE—ALL THE DAMNED TIME!!!!!). And, as Dr. Phil might say, how's THAT working out for ya! I mean, the last time I checked, people were STILL using the word BOSSY to describe both women AND men.

Of course, at this point, the SJWs will no doubt tout some of their “successes” such as the “peaceful protests” in places like Ferguson and Baltimore to somehow stop police shootings of “unarmed” African-American men (again, how did THAT work out for ya!). Oh, you mean those very SAME “peaceful protests” that left BOTH Ferguson and Baltimore in virtual ruins with millions of dollars in damage and a number of primarily BLACK-owned businesses looted and/or burned down altogether? Couple with THAT is the SJWs non-protests, “peaceful” or otherwise, of the ever-increasing homicide rate in Baltimore since the “peaceful protests” of—there again—blacks killing OTHER blacks, including a 7-year-old boy who was murdered in his own home along with his mother. As George W. Bush would say, Mission accomplished, SJWs! “But what about the taking down of the Confederate Flag in South Carolina after that RACIST church shooting?” the SJW's might be saying—or screaming—to me at this point. Actually, the taking down of the CF had MORE to do with the horrific actions of that bastard shooter—whose name I will NOT even bother mentioning here—than ANY “actions” taken on the part of the so-called SJWs. I mean, let's face it, chances are the CF would STILL be flying on the state capital were it NOT for the senseless murders of those churchgoers. What does it say about a “movement” than a deranged killer does MORE to affect change than the insipid “movement” itself?

Which brings me back to my “interaction” with the aforementioned SJWs on Twitter. What was perhaps MOST laughable about the entire interaction—other than, of course, the entire interaction in & of itself—is how one of the SJWs boasted of how they “schooled” me. The only thing they “schooled” me on was just how much of a FRAUD the whole SJW “movement” is and/or what FRAUDS the SJWs—or at least 99.9 ½ % of them—truly are. I mean, in spite of what THEY claim, “justice” is the FURTHEST thing from their narrow minds but rather is ALL about fueling their narcissism. If it wasn't so-called “social justice” it would be something else they would glom onto. These SJWs are like parasites. They're WORSE than parasites, in fact, as practically EVERYTHING they latch onto turns to absolute SHIT from feminism, race issues to even Occupy Wall Street (when's the last time you heard of THAT outfit?). And whenever they do glom onto something—or someone—the SJWs demand complete & total authority and anyone who dares question them in ANY way, including—and especially—one of their own (see the Suey Park tweet above) will get harassed, bullied and, yes, even threatened, including with their very lives. Now I won't go as far as the left and denounce the SJWs as “terrorists” as they've done, say, the Tea Party. Of course, the left hasn't said much of anything about the SJWs even when they act like assholes (with exceptions, as I'll later point out). And that's why I blame the lefties, at least partially so, for the SJWs continued existence.

Before I end this article completely, I would like to offer a “message” to not only the SJWs I unfortunately “encountered” on Twitter but also the SWJs in general: As MUCH time as you spend harassing and/or threatening people like ME for daring to disagree with you on Twitter and Facebook and other social media you COULD have spent doing something IMPORTANT. For instance, you could have spent THAT time doing charity work like working in a soup kitchen and/or a homeless shelter since you claim to "care" SO much about the poor & the downtrodden. Maybe—just maybe!—you could tutor and/or mentor some underprivileged children, especially in the “minority” neighborhoods you claim to “care” SO much about. Or, better yet, why NOT volunteer your apparently oh-so-precious time volunteering at a battered women's shelter since you claim to care SO much about "women's issues" and whatnot (or, of course, you can pull an Arthur Chu and claim yourself a "feminist ally" while you openly mock an ACTUAL rape victim!). There are a whole slew of things you COULD have done in all the fucking time you take—i.e. WASTE—trying to fuck with people on Twitter and elsewhere who dare challenge you on your narcissistic BULLSHIT like ME. But, then again, that's NOT what you're ALL about, is it?

Lastly, I'd like to point out the "difference" between me and an SJW: For one, I get "outraged" by ALL injustice and DON'T pick & choose like the SJWs which injustice, perceived or otherwise (but, with the SJWs, it's MOSTLY perceived!), to get "upset" over (like,, for instance, the aforementioned brutal MURDER of African-American Jamiel Shaw, Jr.). But the MAIN "difference" between me and a damned SJW, as I kindly pointed out to the two SJWs I had the grand misfortune of "dealing" with, is that I, unlike an SJW, WILL FULLY ADMIT I'M FULL OF SHIT!!!! And, to those SJWs I did "encounter" on Twitter, if you weren't in fact "offended" by what I tweeted, why then did YOU even "respond" to me AT ALL in the FIRST damn place? And why-oh-why is it such an affront to YOU that I or anyone else have an opinion that dares differ from YOURS? (One of the SJWs posted a tweet saying how "criticizing isn't censorship" since we all know how SJWs NEVER engage in "censorship" in ANY way!) In closing, my advice to ANYONE on how to "deal" with an SJW on Twitter or elsewhere and their everyone-agree-with-me-or-ELSE BS is:

DON'T!!!!

And, just remember, like ALL the #SJWs like to say:

And, yes, there's also a hashtag for this ONE:
#CheckYourPrivilege

A sidenote: Here is an article from the "controversial" site Return Of Kings about SJWs and their "mindset" I thought I'd share. What was MOST telling is the "testimony" from a self-described former SJW who rather eerily discussed about the cult-like behavior that were not only exhibited by their fellow SJWs but the type of cult-like behavior they demanded of them as well. Anyway, here's the article for anyone who is interested (and I would ask SJWs to real this particular article but I know it would be a waste of breath considering how "open" THEIR minds are!): http://www.returnofkings.com/44691/inside-the-mind-of-the-social-justice-wanker

Here's a video (from YouTube) explaining the SJWs and how they came to be (which I would say is "required" viewing for ANYONE who is a proud anti-SJW like ME!): 

And here's a video of noted diehard leftie "commentator" Bill Maher showing how HE'S not a "fan" of SJWs: https://youtu.be/yzc8glS2r_o

And, just for good measure, here's another video (again, from YouTube) about all this PC BS:

And, lastly, here a song from eighties hair metal band Skid Row that I feel should be the anti-SJW anthem. Enjoy!

Where exactly can I get my white male privilege

I've found the people who "complain" the MOST about "white privilege" are--you guessed it!--rich WHITE liberals. Whoops!

Jack Black and Morgan Freeman Drop the Mic on the #IranDeal

Because who would know MORE about global affairs than a mega-celebrity like Jack Black, star of such "classic movies" like Shallow Hal and singer of such "classic" ditties like Fuck Her Gently (that's an actual song, by the way!)! Well, I'm sold! Seriously, THIS is the reason why I feel celebrities should STFU when it comes to ANYTHING political, global or otherwise, Besides the absolute ridiculousness of this video, I also find it highly ironic these SAME leftie celebs use the EXACT same language the Bush Administration and/or the right-wing press like Fox (Non) News used to justify the U.S. going to war with Iraq, saying how if we DON'T stop Saddam Hussein from amassing Weapons Of Mass Destruction (anyone remember THAT phrase?) there would ALSO be a "mushroom cloud" and such. Again, I ask, left and right: DIFFERENCE?

WHY I SAY GOOD RIDDANCE TO JON STEWART

I agree with Jon in that we should watch more non-biased
political commentary like on MSNBC! (Oh, wait a sec!)

So says the guy who works for Comedy Central who nixed
Mohammed jokes on South Park due to a DEATH THREAT!

And who would know MORE about being poor AND black in
America than Jon Stewart!

I couldn't have said it BETTER myself!

Now THAT'S what I call White Privilege!

"I am so JUST a comedian, dammit!"

What "comedian" needs THREE armed body guards?
Just asking, Jon!

So does THIS mean that Jon Stewart, like his arch-nemesis
Fox (Non) News, is also "Fair & Balanced"?

"Say, Jon, do you remember those 'secret meetings' we had
where I gave you talking points to say on your show?"

The Daily Show host “uber” liberal Jon Stewart recently announced his “retirement” from said hosting duties from TDS. [UPDATE: Since this article was written, Jon Stewart has finally "retired" from TDS, do DON'T blast me for this article NOT being up-to-date, OK?] And I, for one, couldn't be happier! Let me state for the record before I begin that I used to be a BIG fan of Daily Show host Jon Stewart. Not anymore. Why is that, you might ask? Because I find Jon Stewart to be EVERY bit as bigoted, biased, two-faced, hypocritical and just plain full-of-shit as those OTHER “political” commentators—mostly, of course, right-wing—he goes after on a constant basis (remember when he by-now-infamously called then-Crossfire host Tucker Carlson a “dick” after sanctimoniously lecturing how HE was “hurting” America?). I actually started to get down on Jon Stewart when his rather abhorrent interview with CNBC's self-proclaimed “money expert” Jim Cramer aired wherein Jon pretty much blamed the financial crisis on Kramer's apparently erroneous financial “advice” to his viewers, which, to me, is akin to blaming a huge windstorm on a single fart. Watching Jon Stewart in that interview was like watching a left-wing version on Bill O'Reilly (and, please, don't get me started on THAT guy!). Ever since then, Jon has become increasingly more arrogant and/or condescending as he's seemingly embraced the very image—that he's NOT a “serious” newsman/pundit and that he's just a lowly “comedian” and whatnot—that he claims he has SUCH a disdain for; like, for instance, he goes on Rachel Maddow's MSNBC show—which I also don't waste my time watching anymore (especially after she was caught selectively editing a Rand Paul speech)--and insists how no one should be taking him or his show too seriously and then going on Chris Wallace's show on Fox (Non) News and not only likens himself to Mark Twain and Edward R. Murrow (Google it!) but also insists how HARD it is for him to do what he does or whatever. I feel that Jon Stewart, as GQ once alluded to about him, is every bit a part of that “pundiocracy” that he claims is so bad for the country.

I must say I find it rather amusing at how much power and influence he's managed to amass since taking over hosting duties on The Daily Show and how people regard him as some sort of “left-wing messiah” (as I've actually seen him referred to, by the way), especially since I remember how, before hosting TDS, he had one failed talk show after another—including one on, ironically enough, Fox—and no one thought of him as some type of “messiah” or whatever. Another thing I've found rather troublesome about Mr. Stewart is how he rarely ever gets criticized unlike, of course, his other contemporaries such as his “buddy” Bill O'Reilly. And whenever someone DOES openly criticize him he immediately goes on the attack; like, for instance, when he incessantly attacked former CNN anchor Rick Sanchez. Sanchez finally lashed out at Stewart for said incessant attacks against him, adding how he questioned whether Jewish people—like Stewart is—is truly a “minority” in this country. CNN subsequently fired Rick supposedly over his controversial remarks about Jews. However, given at how the “liberal” media continually kissed Jon's behind, I still believe Mr. Sanchez would've STILL gotten fired even without making his quip about Jews since, according to the Leftie Bible: Thou shalt NOT criticize Jon Stewart (or else you WILL lose your career!)! Even former employees of The Daily Show have seemingly refused to publicly say anything good OR bad about their former boss, as reported in an expose published about Jon Stewart in Esquire magazine a couple years back, for apparent fear of his retaliation (which could explain why former employees of TDS, according to the Esquire expose, have been called “battered wives” since Stewart reportedly has a reputation of being a tyrant behind-the-scenes).

Going back to his “retirement” from The Daily Show, Stewart came out and said the reason why for said “retirement” from TDS is that he wanted to spend more time with his family and/or the fact that he was tired of having to watch his arch-nemesis Fox (Non) News all the time. And I'm sure The Daily Show's reported declining ratings have NOTHING at all to do with Jon's “retirement” as TDS is reportedly getting its ass kicked in the ratings on so-called Comedy Central (which is starting to sound more & more like a “funnier” version of MSNBC, thanks in NO small part to Jon “I'm Just a Comedian, Dammit!” Stewart) from Daniel Tosh's show Tosh.O and—gasp!—Inside Amy Schumer.

Perhaps the most “funniest” part of Jon Stewart's “retirement” is how lefties on the so-called blogosphere and elsewhere are figuratively—and, no doubt, literally—crying about how they'll NOT know what to do with themselves now that their “left-wing messiah” Jon Stewart is indeed “retiring” from TDS. For one thing, the SAME lefties who are “crying” about Stewart's “retirement” will no doubt forget about his pretentious lefties ass the day AFTER he “retires” and will rave about his replacement Trevor Noah (who's already gotten into a wee bit of “trouble” himself as his tweets about “fat white women” and/or running over Jewish kids with his German car came to light. Of course, Jon Stewart came to said replacement's “defense” even though Jon himself has gone after others on TDS—again, mostly righties—for saying A LOT less, but I digress.) I mean, look at Stephen Colbert whose right-wing “parody” show The Colbert Report which followed The Daily Show was about as “successful” as TDS. After Stephen's “retirement” from his show to “replace” the vastly overrated David Letterman, his “fans” apparently forgot ALL about him and started focusing their leftie “attention” on Colbert's replacement former Daily Show “correspondent” Larry Wilmore (or is it Wilmur? Wilmore? Wilmur? Whatever!) Hell, just look at how popular & powerful Oprah was until SHE “retired” from her daytime talk show. Then a good chunk (pardon the pun!) of HER popularity and/or power took a steep nosedive as she erroneously obviously believed ALL her (brainwashed?) fans would “watch” her on her TV network OWN. Well, I think we ALL know what happened there, DON'T we? All of Oprah's fans went over and went over to Ellen DeGeneres! And does anyone honestly think it will ANY different for Jon Stewart? As for his “fans” figuratively—and literally—crying over his “retirement” from his show wondering what they are going to do with themselves, how about THINKING FOR THEMSELVES!!!!

Just a kindly suggestion!

I know I'll get at least some people who'll disagree with me on this, especially those diehard Jon Stewart Kool-Aid drinkers. But, speaking strictly for myself, I no longer choose to drink the Jon Stewart Kool-Aid and I feel I'm a much better-informed person for it. The bottom is, I don't need Jon Stewart to tell me what to think or believe anymore than I need, say, Bill O'Reilly to tell me what to think or believe, you know what I mean?

A sidenote: Since this article was initially written, it was revealed that Jon Stewart had "secret meetings" on at least two separate occasions with none other than the POTUS himself Barack Obama. Of course, Stewart tried to "downplay" this, invoking his "I'm just a comedian!" ruse he ALWAYS invokes whenever he gets caught showing his OWN blatant bias. But, what I'd like to know is, if there was nothing to these "secret meetings" with Obama, why then wasn't he honest & upfront about them to begin with? As I understand it, one of these "meetings" took place when Obama was running for President and another time was when he was trying to get some piece of legislation passed. And we're just supposed to take Jon Stewart at his "comedic" word that nothing "improper" was going on during these "meetings"? Hell, even Stewart implied that maybe--just maybe!--Obama might have been trying to "influence" him on something. Now, for those "fans" of TDS who say this ISN'T a big deal, could you imagine the shit Stewart would have given, say, Bill O'Reilly if he had "secret meetings" with then-"President" George W. Bush? I mean, how in the hell are we supposed to know that at least SOME of what Stewart was saying about Obama WASN'T merely "talking points" coming from the Obama Administration itself (one or two other reports I heard suggest that the OA had in fact been in "contact" with various member of TDS; gee, I wonder WHY?)? This is yet ANOTHER reason why I'm glad Jon Stewart is "retiring" from TDS (or, rather, at the time of THIS writing, he HAS mercifully "retired"!)!

A side-sidenote: Here's an article I found on Salon.com (which is hardly a "conservative" site) about Jon Stewart that's one of the very few times anyone has EVER been critical of The Almighty Jon Stewart online or anywhere else, for THAT matter, especially from ANYONE on The Left. (This article, if true, also VERY seriously calls into question Jon Stewart's claim of being AGAINST racism in any form.)
http://www.salon.com/2014/04/09/jon_stewart_cursed_me_out_i_dared_question_a_daily_show_warm_up_comics_racist_jokes/

A side-side-sidenote: Yet another rather asinine interview I watched Jon Stewart give with his umpteenth interview with his "frenemy" Bill O'Reilly about the dreaded White Privilege! You can watch the "interview" and judge how asinine it is for yourself. But one thing I will point out is when Jon asks Bill if his "hometown" of Levittown, New York allowed minorities during the time that he was growing up. When O'Reilly said they didn't, Jon Stewart thundered, "That's White Privilege!" Actually, it was more due to the discriminatory housing policies put forth by the GOVERNMENT at the time, that very SAME government that Stewart claims only wants to do "good" for America and Americans in general. Whoops! Another thing I found SO asinine about this "interview" was that BOTH Jon Stewart and Bill O'Reilly are two of the MOST "privileged" White People in America if NOT the entire planet as Jon Stewart has a reported net worth of around $80 million and Bill O'Reilly "earns" a reported $10 million A YEAR hosting his show on Fox (Non) News not to mention, of course, all the untold millions he "earns" from all those "bestselling" books he (supposedly) writes. Again, whoops! Anyway, here is Jon Stewart/Bill O'Reilly's White Privilege "debate":

And, while we're at it, here's a clip taken from The Daily Show of Jon "I Condemn Right-Wing Racists!" Stewart saying . . . well, you'll see!